The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly by select Chinese companies like DeepSeek, have caught the attention of the global economic communityGoldman Sachs, in a recent report, highlighted that these advancements have led to the creation of generative AI models that are more cost-effective than existing offeringsThis breakthrough is poised to accelerate the adoption of AI technologies worldwide and potentially enhance their contribution to global economic growth.

Historically, there has been a prevailing belief that the high costs of investment act as a significant barrier to entry for the most sophisticated AI modelsHowever, Joseph Briggs, co-head of Goldman Sachs' global economics team, in his remarks, indicated that the precise methodologies employed by Chinese researchers to develop these technologies, along with their overall costs, remain somewhat ambiguousDespite this, a more economical cost structure could facilitate a swifter proliferation and evolution of AI on a global scale.

Briggs articulated that if reduced costs foster a competitive environment for platform and application development, this could indeed broaden the macroeconomic landscape in the medium termCurrently, the principal bottleneck hindering the realization of AI's associated productivity gains lies in limited adoptionIncreasing competition will likely expedite the construction of AI platforms and applications, thereby promoting wider acceptance of the technology.

Nonetheless, he cautioned that the immediate impacts of adoption could be somewhat mutedThe cost alone is not seen as the primary obstacle to widespread adoption at this stage, according to the dataAccording to the U.SCensus Bureau, the predominant barriers to AI adoption cited by companies often include insufficient understanding of AI capabilities and privacy concerns, with only a mere 6% of American firms currently reporting regular use of AI in their operations, a slight increase from 4% reported at the end of 2023.

How precisely could AI contribute to an increase in GDP? Prior projections from Goldman Sachs’ economic team suggest that the widespread adoption of generative AI has the potential to elevate U.S. labor productivity by approximately 15% over the next decade, primarily through the automation of work tasks

Advertisements

This could potentially unlock about $4.5 trillion in annual GDP for the United States (in current dollars). It is anticipated that early benefits will accrue to hardware and infrastructure providers, subsequently reaching platform and application developers, and ultimately transforming production and efficiency across a broader spectrum of industries.

Furthermore, it is expected that the AI investment cycle in the U.S. will gradually reduce once GDP growth reaches 2%, as the costs associated with training AI models and executing AI queries declineWith an anticipated increase in end-user adoption rates, AI software investment is likely to experience steady growth over time.

While China’s progress in AI has stirred debate regarding the investment and technological leadership of several existing corporations, Goldman Sachs maintains its stance on the macroeconomic implications of AIThey predict that the primary impetus for macroeconomic growth will stem from the productivity gains realized when companies integrate AI-driven automation into their operations.

Briggs also pointed out that the emergence of a credible competitor challenging U.SAI leaders could enhance both global adoption rates and productivity levelsA formidable non-U.S. competitor could drive governments to recognize the importance of developing AI capabilities, potentially leading to a more competitive landscape that fosters collaboration across borders or reduces regulatory hurdles, thereby encouraging AI's progression and adoption.

Meanwhile, Briggs emphasized that the potential for automation and productivity gains brought about by generative AI would be relatively uniform across different economies globallyAlthough it is still predicted that the U.S. will adopt AI more swiftly than other nations due to its current advantages in AI model development, the rise of non-U.S. platforms and applications could expedite adoption timelines in other regions.

Regarding productivity enhancement, Goldman Sachs’ forecasts assume that significant uptake of generative AI technologies in the U.S. would begin to reflect in productivity metrics by 2027, with peak impacts expected in the early 2030s

Advertisements

Other developed markets and key emerging economies may lag by several years in realizing similar effectsHowever, Briggs noted that reports from DeepSeek suggest the possibility of earlier adoption than previously anticipated.

Goldman Sachs continues to project that AI adoption will trend upward in the medium termBriggs mentioned that the types of tasks that generative AI can automate have the potential to yield substantial cost savings for each employee—potentially thousands of dollars annuallyGiven the considerable cost-saving potential associated with generative AI and the likely minimal marginal costs for deployment once applications are fully developed, the question surrounding generative AI adoption is more likely to be “when” rather than “if.”

There remain reasonable questions about how low-cost AI models might affect stakeholders in the broader AI ecosystemThe distribution of any profits will heavily depend on market concentration, intellectual property entitlements, scalability, and ultimately, the competitive landscapeWhile it is still premature to fully assess the implications of these new models, the effects on companies invested in essential hardware and computational capabilities may be less pronounced if these elements become less crucial for realizing economic benefits.

However, Briggs pointed out that the questions regarding profit distribution are somewhat peripheral to the overarching macroeconomic narrativeThe future outlook does not hinge on which specific players benefit; rather, the overall impact of the Chinese breakthrough is likely to be net positive.

A pivotal inquiry revolves around whether the emergence of more efficient AI models might lead to a reduction in AI capital expendituresStock analysts project AI-related capital expenditures to soar to $325 billion by the fourth quarter of 2025 based on widespread estimationsWill this not curtail GDP growth instead? Goldman Sachs highlights that if cheaper models indeed result in diminished AI-related capital expenditures, two scenarios may mitigate potential negative economic impacts

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements